Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review (2024)

Abstract

Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants’ global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-283
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • acne
  • alpha-hydroxy acid
  • azelaic acid
  • nicotinamide
  • salicylic acid
  • sulfur
  • zinc

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  • Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review (1)

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

  • APA
  • Author
  • BIBTEX
  • Harvard
  • Standard
  • RIS
  • Vancouver

Liu, H., Yu, H., Xia, J., Liu, L., Liu, G., Sang, H., & Peinemann, F. (2020). Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 13(4), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12411

Liu, Haibo ; Yu, Haiyan ; Xia, Jun et al. / Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne : an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. In: Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2020 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 275-283.

@article{e50d9a043e65487d8b3ac81daa10dbb7,

title = "Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review",

abstract = "Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants{\textquoteright} global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.",

keywords = "acne, alpha-hydroxy acid, azelaic acid, nicotinamide, salicylic acid, sulfur, zinc",

author = "Haibo Liu and Haiyan Yu and Jun Xia and Ling Liu and Guanjian Liu and Hong Sang and Frank Peinemann",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd",

year = "2020",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1111/jebm.12411",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "275--283",

journal = "Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine",

issn = "1756-5383",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "4",

}

Liu, H, Yu, H, Xia, J, Liu, L, Liu, G, Sang, H & Peinemann, F 2020, 'Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review', Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12411

Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. / Liu, Haibo; Yu, Haiyan; Xia, Jun et al.
In: Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 11.2020, p. 275-283.

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne

T2 - an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review

AU - Liu, Haibo

AU - Yu, Haiyan

AU - Xia, Jun

AU - Liu, Ling

AU - Liu, Guanjian

AU - Sang, Hong

AU - Peinemann, Frank

N1 - Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants’ global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.

AB - Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants’ global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.

KW - acne

KW - alpha-hydroxy acid

KW - azelaic acid

KW - nicotinamide

KW - salicylic acid

KW - sulfur

KW - zinc

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092157233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jebm.12411

DO - 10.1111/jebm.12411

M3 - Article

C2 - 33034949

AN - SCOPUS:85092157233

SN - 1756-5383

VL - 13

SP - 275

EP - 283

JO - Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

IS - 4

ER -

Liu H, Yu H, Xia J, Liu L, Liu G, Sang H et al. Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2020 Nov;13(4):275-283. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12411

Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Arline Emard IV

Last Updated:

Views: 6362

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arline Emard IV

Birthday: 1996-07-10

Address: 8912 Hintz Shore, West Louie, AZ 69363-0747

Phone: +13454700762376

Job: Administration Technician

Hobby: Paintball, Horseback riding, Cycling, Running, Macrame, Playing musical instruments, Soapmaking

Introduction: My name is Arline Emard IV, I am a cheerful, gorgeous, colorful, joyous, excited, super, inquisitive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.