Abstract
Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants’ global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 275-283 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- acne
- alpha-hydroxy acid
- azelaic acid
- nicotinamide
- salicylic acid
- sulfur
- zinc
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
Liu, H., Yu, H., Xia, J., Liu, L., Liu, G., Sang, H., & Peinemann, F. (2020). Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 13(4), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12411
Liu, Haibo ; Yu, Haiyan ; Xia, Jun et al. / Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne : an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. In: Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2020 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 275-283.
@article{e50d9a043e65487d8b3ac81daa10dbb7,
title = "Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants{\textquoteright} global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.",
keywords = "acne, alpha-hydroxy acid, azelaic acid, nicotinamide, salicylic acid, sulfur, zinc",
author = "Haibo Liu and Haiyan Yu and Jun Xia and Ling Liu and Guanjian Liu and Hong Sang and Frank Peinemann",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/jebm.12411",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "275--283",
journal = "Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "1756-5383",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",
}
Liu, H, Yu, H, Xia, J, Liu, L, Liu, G, Sang, H & Peinemann, F 2020, 'Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review', Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12411
Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. / Liu, Haibo; Yu, Haiyan; Xia, Jun et al.
In: Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 11.2020, p. 275-283.
Research output: Journal Publication › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne
T2 - an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review
AU - Liu, Haibo
AU - Yu, Haiyan
AU - Xia, Jun
AU - Liu, Ling
AU - Liu, Guanjian
AU - Sang, Hong
AU - Peinemann, Frank
N1 - Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants’ global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.
AB - Objective: The effects of topical azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) for acne are unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of these topical treatments by collecting randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to May 2019. We also searched five trials registers. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5 software. Results: We included a total of 49 trials involving 3880 participants. In terms of treatment response (measured using participants’ global self-assessment of acne improvement, PGA), azelaic acid was probably less effective than benzoyl peroxide (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95). However, there was probably little or no difference in PGA when comparing azelaic acid to tretinoin (RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). There may be little or no difference when comparing salicylic acid to tretinoin (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). There were no studies measured PGA when evaluating nicotinamide. With respect to alpha-hydroxy acid, there may be no difference in PGA when comparing glycolic acid to salicylic-mandelic acid (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26). We were uncertain about the effects of sulfur and zinc. Adverse events associated with these topical treatments were always mild and transient. Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence was available for azelaic acid and low- to very-low-quality evidence for other topical treatments. Risk of bias and imprecision limit our confidence in the evidence.
KW - acne
KW - alpha-hydroxy acid
KW - azelaic acid
KW - nicotinamide
KW - salicylic acid
KW - sulfur
KW - zinc
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092157233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jebm.12411
DO - 10.1111/jebm.12411
M3 - Article
C2 - 33034949
AN - SCOPUS:85092157233
SN - 1756-5383
VL - 13
SP - 275
EP - 283
JO - Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
JF - Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
IS - 4
ER -
Liu H, Yu H, Xia J, Liu L, Liu G, Sang H et al. Evidence-based topical treatments (azelaic acid, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, sulfur, zinc, and fruit acid) for acne: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2020 Nov;13(4):275-283. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12411